CONCEPTIONS OF SOCIAL SCIENCE TEACHERS OVER THE NATURE OF CRITICAL THINKING

Article Sidebar

PDF (Spanish)
Published: 2010-04-15
DOI: https://doi.org/10.11600/ale.v2i1.15

Main Article Content

Eleonora Ardila Segura

Abstract

This article is the product of the research process forward through the project "Training of critical thinking in the area of Social Sciences" funded by the Research Center of the National Pedagogical University - CIUP. It discusses the concepts that has built a group of teachers about the nature of critical thinking in teaching social sciences, from two perspectives identified in the study: which it considers critical thinking as a mental operation, a process or an investigation, through which students solve problems or operate in schooling and everyday life, and that which sees it as a thought, an action and a permanent stance that reveal social injustices, advocate equality and work in social exchange perspective.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

Issue

Vol. 2 No. 1 (2010): Making way from our own geography

Section

Resultados de investigación
Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

Authors publishing in this journal agree to the following terms: a. The authors retainthe copyright to the journal and ensure the right to be the first publication of work asLicensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others toshare the work with an acknowledgment of the authorship of the work and the initial publication in this magazine. b. Authors may establish separate additional agreements to the non-exclusive distribution of the version of the work published inthe journal (for example, place it in an institutional repository or publish it in a book),with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal. c. It allows and encourages authors to disseminate their work electronically (eg, in institutional repositories or on their own website) before and during the submission process,as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as a subpoena more early andmost of the published (See The Effect of Open Access) (in English).