Territories of reading, writing and orality in the Coffee Region An understanding of narratives produced by sociocultural promoters from the Count on Efigas Program.
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
The objective of this article is to understand the territories of reading, writing and orality in Colombia’s Coffee Region through the narratives produced by the sociocultural promoters that work for the Count on Efigas program. This qualitative study used Participatory Action Research (PAR) and narrative analysis methodologies. The participants were 74 sociocultural promoters, including teachers, librarians and cultural managers, and who worked with 500 children and young people. The results show significant transformations in reading, writing and orality practices in the communities, highlighting the importance of using the sociocultural approach and focusing on human capabilities to develop communicative and critical skills. The authors’ conclusions highlight the need to democratize these practices in order to encourage the active and conscious participation of individuals in communities.
Downloads
Article Details
Issue
Section
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Authors publishing in this journal agree to the following terms: a. The authors retainthe copyright to the journal and ensure the right to be the first publication of work asLicensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others toshare the work with an acknowledgment of the authorship of the work and the initial publication in this magazine. b. Authors may establish separate additional agreements to the non-exclusive distribution of the version of the work published inthe journal (for example, place it in an institutional repository or publish it in a book),with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal. c. It allows and encourages authors to disseminate their work electronically (eg, in institutional repositories or on their own website) before and during the submission process,as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as a subpoena more early andmost of the published (See The Effect of Open Access) (in English).
References
Aguilar-Forero, N., Salazar, F. y Aguilar-Forero, P. (2023). La construcción de ciudadanía mundial en bibliotecas rurales: Una sistematización de dos experiencias en Colombia. Información, cultura y sociedad, (48). doi:10.34096/ics.i48.12519 DOI: https://doi.org/10.34096/ics.i48.12519
Calderón, F., & López, A. (2008). Investigación-acción participativa y desarrollo comunitario. Editorial Abya Yala.
Castrillón, S. y Roa, P. (2020). La lectura, la escritura y la oralidad: El derecho a la cultura escrita. Biblioteca Nacional de Colombia y Ministerio de Cultura.
Cassany, D. (2006). Tras las líneas. Sobre la lectura contemporánea. Anagrama.
Deleuze, G. (1990). El poder: Curso en el Collège de France (1982-1983). Ediciones Cátedra.
Fals-Borda, O. (2008). El Problema de Cómo Investigar la Realidad para Transformarla: Por Qué y Cómo Quienes Investigan Actúan Transforman. Siglo XXI Editores.
Flick, U. (2007). Managing quality in qualitative research. SAGE Publications. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4135/9781849209441
Foucault, M. (1991). Discipline and Punish: The Birth of the Prison. Penguin Books.
Freire, P. (2011). Education for Critical Consciousness. Bloomsbury Publishing.
Giraldo-López, D. y Ramírez-García, J. (2018). Territorios: Lecturas y escrituras para ser, recorrer y habitar. [Tesis de Pregrado, Universidad de Antioquia]. https://bibliotecadigital.udea.edu.co/handle/10495/12260
Hurtado, D. (2000). La alfabetización en contextos de diversidad cultural. Fondo Editorial de la Universidad Pedagógica Nacional.
Kalman, J. (2003). El acceso a la cultura escrita: un proceso de apropiación. Siglo XXI Editores.