The Digital Portfolio as a Reflection and Self-Assessment Tool for Higher Education Teachers
Main Article Content
Abstract
This article presents the results of the appropriation of the digital portfolio as an instrument for reflection and self-evaluation of university teachers during their participation in an institutional qualification process. From a qualitative approach, it was used the constant comparative method which was also part of the grounded theory, taking as analysis unit the reflections and interpretations made by the participants during the workshops, the digital portfolio, interviews and the focus group. As result, an appropriation of the digital portfolio was identified on the teachers at three levels: first, as a reflection for preparing for the task of being educators; second, as a way of self-reflection, assessment and ongoing professional improvement; and third, as a challenge for reflecting on their teaching task and for integrating new technologies as part of their continuous professional improvement. The digital portfolio can become an efficient strategy for integral teachers’ training in higher education if it takes part of institutional policies to guide teachers’ qualification processes.
Downloads
Article Details
Issue
Section

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Authors publishing in this journal agree to the following terms: a. The authors retainthe copyright to the journal and ensure the right to be the first publication of work asLicensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others toshare the work with an acknowledgment of the authorship of the work and the initial publication in this magazine. b. Authors may establish separate additional agreements to the non-exclusive distribution of the version of the work published inthe journal (for example, place it in an institutional repository or publish it in a book),with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal. c. It allows and encourages authors to disseminate their work electronically (eg, in institutional repositories or on their own website) before and during the submission process,as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as a subpoena more early andmost of the published (See The Effect of Open Access) (in English).